Judicial reform of Alexander 2

Judicial reform is one of the Great reforms of Alexander II. The reforms carried out by him in a liberal spirit changed our country, gave freedom to many and brought it to a new level of development.

Great reforms Alexander II began with the abolition of the main inhibitory force of the country's modernization - serfdom. This reform was difficult, and it was not easy to decide on it. Changes affected all segments of the population, which means that it was necessary to carefully consider all possible controversial situations. As you know, redemption payments made it difficult for peasants to obtain personal freedom. However, this did not stop the emperor - he is taking a number of important transformations. Judicial reform is a new stage in the development of the judiciary in Russia. It is thanks to this reform that the Bar has appeared, the jury trial . We are talking about such phenomena now as an inalienable sphere of legal life, and then they aroused a lot of controversy and questions. The concept of judicial reform assumed a transition to the European system. This indicated that the court had to become unconscious, and all processes - open.

So, the judicial reform was started in 1864. All innovations were implemented gradually, so that there were no strong performances against the new system.

Judicial reforms of Alexander 2 led to the creation of a strong judicial base, contributed to the establishment of equality for all before the law, as well as the development of the legal system and the formation of new bodies. This reform was radical, which provoked unrest among the nobility. First and foremost, this was due to the introduction of courtlessness. As mentioned above, it was this reform that put both the peasant and the nobleman in one row. Also, massive dissatisfaction with the new transformations was caused by the introduction of a jury trial. Now, according to the accused, the case could be considered by jurors - independent people, who pass their verdict. This principle often did not justify their expectations: there were cases when a jury trial rendered an acquittal to a person whose guilt was simply obvious. For example, the well-known in those years story about Vera Zasulich, who was found not guilty.

What was the result of the new judicial system in the country? As it was said above, one of the consequences of the reforms was frequent acquittals to objectively guilty people. Also, the judicial reform announced the publicity of the court. This principle led to the fact that the court sessions began to be used as a source of scandalous news and compromising material. Such events were not uncommon, after which the reformers decided to limit the openness of the trials.

Thus, the judicial reform conducted by the Emperor Alexander the Liberator led to the establishment of a ramified judicial power in our country: an advocacy office was established, and a jury trial was established. The proclamation of the court's illegitimacy, openness and openness of the trial contributed to the humanization of the legal system.