What was the first one: an egg or a chicken? Dinosaur!

Logical paradoxes have always attracted philosophers. One of them is familiar to us. What was the first one: an egg or a chicken? On the one hand, this phrase has long symbolized empty disputes and decisions that can not be found. On the other hand, philosophers of all ages, and even modern scientists, thought of solving the problem. I must say that the catch is in the formulation itself. Initially, it did not sound like an "egg or a chicken," but as an "egg or a bird." This is fundamentally important, because it provides an opportunity to generalize. Let us give some examples.

What was the first one: an egg or a chicken? The opinion of the ancients

Aristotle and Plutarch came to the conclusion that they appeared simultaneously, arguing approximately the same. A hen (or bird) is born from an egg, so it can not be the first. The egg carries a chicken, so it too can not be the first. Consequently, they appeared simultaneously.

That the first appeared: an egg or a chicken (from the point of view of modern scientists)

Contemporaries are more cunning: they analyze the meaning of words. So, an egg, they say, is a whole series of mutations that led to the formation of such a form. Undoubtedly, there is only one answer: the first egg appeared, because not only birds but also dinosaurs were born from eggs, and Other animals that lived before them.

If we only mean a chicken egg, then the question remains unanswered: scientists simply do not have any facts.

If, answering the question: "What's the first thing that appeared: an egg or a chicken?", The word "chicken" is replaced by the word "bird", then it will be necessary to think differently. Undoubtedly, before the chicken, there were other species of birds. Some of them were intermediate and had features that did not quite resemble a chicken. They carried something like eggs. And only at a certain point in time they began to be called the words "chicken" or "egg." Such lengthy reasoning does not answer the question posed. This method of asking questions and answers uses concepts with an unclear amount. This means that each term included in a phrase does not have a clear meaning. What about the egg? Who do they mean by the name of a hen? Everyone can give his own words, wider or narrower, meaning. A non-paradoxical question should not only talk about an egg, but about an egg with a chicken. That is why there is no answer, more precisely, there can be several.

1. Egg, because oviposition appeared much earlier than a species called "chicken" was formed.
2. Chicken, because she began to bear chicken eggs.

Other logical paradoxes

Such paradoxes are an excellent training for the mind. History knows a lot of them.

1. Everything that is written here is not true. If we assume that what has been written has a true meaning, then it will be false. But if we take for granted the fact that the message is false, then the writing will turn out to be true.
2. Limit yourself in everything, even in restraint. (Petronius).
3. If you put a cat in a dark box, put a hammer and ampoule with poison, the cat will be alive and dead at the same time (Schrodinger).
4. If you remove the heap from the heap on a grain of sand, when it ceases to be a heap?

Such paradoxes can be conceptual, determinative, probabilistic, mathematical, topological, and so on.