Problems and analysis of the story of V. Shukshin "Cut"

Analysis of Shukshin's story "Cut" is very important for understanding the creativity of this writer. And also in general his author's worldview. Biographers know that the writer himself attached great importance to him.

Story plot plot

For a deep analysis of Shukshin's story "Cut" it is necessary to know that the figure of Gleb Kapustin is in the center of the narrative. This is the classic hero of Shukshin. A malicious, laughable and well-read peasant. He himself from the village, but passion like to argue with the townspeople, to compete with them with the power of intelligence.

In the outset of the work Shukshin Konstantin Ivanovich comes to visit the old woman Agafia Zhuravleva. He is a successful university lecturer, Ph.D. His wife is also engaged in science. They bring up a schoolgirl daughter.

On a visit to his mother, Konstantin Ivanovich does not come empty-handed. He brings those things which, in his opinion, are necessary in the village. Among the gifts - a bathrobe, an electric samovar and wooden spoons.

Country people

When analyzing the story Shukshin "Cut" it is very important to understand how the author perceives the villagers. After all, they play one of the key roles in his works.

Carrying out an analysis of the story of V. M. Shukshin "Cut", you can pay attention that he has great respect for the villagers.

In this story, many characters who have received a good education, have made a career and succeeded in this life. For example, one of them is a doctor, the other is a colonel, the third is a correspondent. And there are two more pilots.

This category also includes one of the central characters - PhD Zhuravlev. When either of these people returns to their native village, a ritual is the story of their present life. At the same time they go to communicate with the people with an open mind, noticing in the countrymen a sincere interest in themselves and their lives.

Provostator Kapustin

In the analysis of Shukshin's story "Cut", much attention is paid to the figure of Gleb Kapustin. From every meeting with a fellow countryman, who became a city man, he arranges a real play.

All evening he devotes only one goal. Catch the conceited, in his opinion, rights on some error or inaccuracy. On ignorance of some important historical fact.

The central dispute of the story

In the analysis of the story "Cut" Shukshin briefly need to pay attention to the dispute that occurred between Gleb and Zhuravlev.

They argue about the one who gave the order about the arson of Moscow during the Patriotic War of 1812. As soon as the reader learns the topic of the dispute, he immediately begins to suspect that the denouement of the plot will be dramatic. Kapustin does everything to "cut" the candidate of sciences Zhuravlev. The rest of the villagers have long been watching such performances and are eagerly waiting for each new performance.

At this time, the candidate himself does not suspect anything about the impending test. There is a certain ambiguity. Zhuravlev appears in the role of candidate of science and candidate for the next "cutting". He is a victim who still does not suspect that she has to endure.

The essence of the conversation between Kapustin and Zhuravlev

Shukshin describes in detail the essence of their conversation . "Cut," a summary, the analysis of which is the subject of research of many literary scholars, gives an idea of the author's worldview. Zhuravlev expects that the conversation will go nostalgic - about childhood, past heroes. However, Kapustin begins to actively discuss philosophical topics.

The candidate of sciences tries in every possible way to evade the conversation, makes attempts to laugh off, but all is unsuccessful. Kapustin digs into him like a tick. He sees before himself a clear task - to prove that the intellect of an opponent does not reach the level of a candidate of science. So, he does not deserve the position he received in society, he has no right to call himself urban. Kapustin seeks to prevent the city laughing at provincials who are in no way inferior to them in terms of intelligence, despite the fact that they are not marked by academic degrees.

At some point, Gleb expressly declares his intentions. He says that he likes to click on the nose of the interlocutor, for the sake of it and starts scandalous conversations.

It turns out that the names of the characters are not accidental, but symbolic. Zhuravlyov soars somewhere in the sky, embodying the social elite, and Kapustin has never been able to go beyond the boundaries of his own garden.

Who is right?

Reading the details of the dispute, the reader clearly understands Kapustin's wrong. And both in form and content. He refers to Zhuravlev's lengthy tirades, which contain more indirect insults than common sense and rational sentences. This is a dispute for the sake of argument, not to establish the truth. He is wrong from the ethical point of view, as he is satisfied with this whole performance with the person to whom he came to visit.

However, cautious critics find a lot of common sense in the very position that Kapustin holds. Indeed, after discovering and writing new books, learned men often forget about the people's and the public good, about the people for the sake of which they all do it. After all, in an ideal world, any of their work should be aimed at improving the hard life of ordinary people.

The essence of Shukshin's story

The problematic of Shukshin's story "Cut" is to force society to look attentively at the intellectual potential of an ordinary Russian person. Let not be burdened with rewards and titles. This is what the work "Cut" calls for. Analysis of Shukshin's story underscores the need to establish insurmountable obstacles to the so-called mass culture and pseudo-art, which spread intellectual wretchedness and bad taste.

In his story Shukshin seeks to click on the nose of those who are accustomed to talking with an ordinary person from the people from the standpoint of aristocracy and arrogance, boasting of his high position. The writer insists that the social status of a person imposes certain duties on him, and not only gives benefits and privileges. A person who has achieved a certain position in society must invariably follow it. And in all respects. This is described in the pages of the work "Cut". Analysis of Shukshin's story makes us think about how we treat and communicate with other people, and also do not forget that we need to constantly grow in professional and creative terms. Since all the time to leave on the previous merits will not succeed.

Position of Shukshin

Vasily Makarovich Shukshin - a bright Soviet writer, who always worried about the problems of the common people. His characters are the inhabitants of an ordinary village in the Soviet Union. Most of them are hard workers with a complicated and peculiar character. They are very observant and sharp on the tongue. For a word in your pocket will not go.

In the fate of many of these heroes there is room for heroism. A vivid example is the character of one of his early works Pashka Kolokolnikov. He appeared in the comedic melodrama "There Is Such a Guy", which Shukshin himself shot.

In this case, many are clearly not of this world. They are practically called into the eyes of eccentrics, fellow villagers do not understand their aspirations. Although the intentions of such heroes are simple, pure and naive, they do not fit into the pragmatic way of life of the majority of Soviet peasants.

In general, the Russian village is one of the main characters of Shukshin. It is described laconically, but very deep and capacious. It can be seen that the author himself knows all the details and features of this life. At the forefront, Shukshin often endures moral problems, as happens in the story "Cut".