Commitment to the ideas of royal power in the 21st century

People who have a commitment to the ideas of royalty, there are almost any country in Europe. Among all these states are those who are already monarchies in the form of their government.

"The Old Woman" Europe

To date, the monarchy in one form or another has survived in several countries of the Old World. We are talking about such countries as Great Britain, Spain, Denmark, Belgium, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Andorra, Vatican and Luxembourg.

The most interesting among them all is Great Britain, where adherence to the ideas of royal power is most serious. The monarchy in this state has a long history. As a result, today there are a huge number of different rituals and rules related to the royal family. Currently, on the throne of Great Britain is Queen Elizabeth II. In the possession of the ruling person is a gigantic complex led by a magnificent palace. The United Kingdom is a parliamentary monarchy. As a result, officially, the king or queen has virtually no serious power at all. At the same time, in fact, these people have serious investments, and the popularity they possess allows them to have enough weight in the society.

Royal power in England is now probably the most stable among all other states with a monarchy. This is largely due to the fact that here all the processes of transferring power to the people were relatively slow. As a result, the crowned family was neither executed nor deprived of its title.

Asian monarchies

Commitment to the ideas of royal power is available to people not only of the Old World, but also of the Asian states. The list of monarchies in this part of the world includes as many as 13 states. The most interesting among them are Saudi Arabia and Japan. If in the second the emperor has virtually no serious rights and opportunities to influence the policy of the state, then the first is a truly strong monarchy. Here the commitment to the ideas of the royal government at a sufficiently high level is supported primarily by the high welfare of citizens, which increased during the reign of the monarch. The fact is that Saudi Arabia has a rich supply of high-quality oil. The state, headed by the monarch, built an excellent model for the redistribution of these goods. As a result, a considerable part of the sale of oil settles not only in the treasury, but also in the pockets of ordinary citizens. It is for this reason that over the last several decades there has been a noticeable increase in royal power in this state.

Pros of the monarchy

This type of government, regardless of what opinion is held by various human rights activists, has its advantages. First of all, we are talking about the speed of decision-making and the speed with which they are implemented. In the case where the power is concentrated in the same hands, this or that task can be accomplished as quickly as possible.

Even if we are talking about those monarchies where adherence to the ideas of royal power is formal, then here one can benefit. The fact is that the crowned family in this case is a kind of symbol of the unity of the state.

Disadvantages of the monarchy

The main minus of this form of government is the fact that sooner or later a person will arise on the throne, unable to make the right decisions and lead the people. At the same time, it is hardly possible to change the monarch.

As for the formal royal government, then he also has his own flaw. The fact is that in most countries it is necessary to allocate large amounts of money from the budget for the maintenance of the court . This is especially noticeable in the case of small states.