Participial turnover. Punctuation marks in the case of gerundive, adverbial participle and participial turnover

What is a gerundive turnover? What punctuation marks are used in writing to distinguish a verbal participle? What is the role of gerundive turnover in a sentence? In this article, we will analyze these questions, and also answer questions about when it is necessary to isolate such constructions, and when this should not be done. Of course, in the course of the article we will analyze the relevant examples.

Introduction

A participial turn, punctuation marks under the gerundive turnover have long become an integral part of the study of the Russian language program, which is being started in high school. So, what is a gerundive turnover?

A participial turn is nothing more than a de-participle, which has dependent words. Such a turn can be expressed and isolated circumstance.

As is known, in Russian there are both independent parts of speech, and official. So, to the first group is just the gerund, from which a verbal participle is composed. Punctuation marks with a non-participial turnover are governed by the use of appropriate rules, which we will consider in the following paragraphs.

In general, this part of speech means, in fact, an additional action. In this case, it refers to the main action described in a certain fragment of the text. And more: punctuation marks with participial and adverbial participle are put equally.

What is the gospel of the gospel?

It combines the signs of two parts of speech: verb and adverb.

What is there in verbal participle from each named part of speech?

From the verb gerundive "got" such signs as kind and pledge, recompense. And from the adverb, the "inherited" the unchangeability, as well as the syntactic role that is inherent in the circumstance.

What are the questions of the gospel?

This part of the speech answers the following questions: "What are you doing?", "What did you do?"

Introduction to gyroprints

What is a single gerundive in the Russian language, we have already found out. But what is the whole design? Punctuation marks with a non-participial turn can be placed in different positions, according to the rules.

The construction is a system of a single verbal participle and dependent words that are attached to it. The remaining parameters of the turnover remain the same as in the case of a single verbal participle. It is primarily about the issues to which it is responsible, as well as its role in the proposal. Punctuation marks in sentences with gerundive turnover can stand in several positions.

Assume that the sentence contains this part of the speech. Then, in the same sentence, there must be a predicate expressed in the verb. It will denote the main action taking place, while the gerundive or gerundive turnover will complement this action with some clarifications or clarifications, if you like.

Participial turnover. Punctuation marks with a tie

At once it is necessary to tell, that statement of punctuation will have some nuances. There are some algorithms that will allow you to understand most of the cases. However, sometimes the rules become powerless in the case of those proposals, when, it would seem, the comma should stand, but in reality it does not exist. Only intuition can help here, because the rules do not explain such cases. But we will deal with this later, but now let's talk about something else.

Using the verbal participle, a person must clearly realize that the main action (expressed by the verb, the role of which is the predicate) and the additional action (expressed by our beloved participial turn) are related to the same person.

It is worth noting the fact that such constructions often take place in single-member proposals of a specifically personal type. The predicate in such a sentence can be expressed by a verb standing in the imperative mood. This, by the way, means that the subject in the sentence will be fairly easy to find.

Another nuance: you can also use the verbal participle in impersonal sentences. In this case, he will have a connection with the verb-infinitive.

Examples of participial turns in sentences

1) Quietly, almost crouching down to the ground, he passed by, not taking his eyes off the object of his observation.

2) They cursed for a long time, using sharp words that did not have the best sense, and then she left, slamming her farewell with the door.

3) And who would have thought that, having decided, at last, to bring his room in order, he would find something that he had so long lacked, about which he had almost forgotten?

4) After seeing a pack of dogs, the cat did not just scramble up a tree - it almost flew at him.

5) Having let out from under the wheels a puff of smoke, the car sharply scratched the tires with asphalt and, after a long roar, made a quick leap forward.

Punctuation

Punctuation marks with a non-participial turn are put in different cases. Their use is regulated by rules and exceptions. Usually they depend on where in the sentence there is a verbal participle. Punctuation marks in the case of a tie-part rotation can be placed on one side (if the turn is at the very beginning or end of the sentence), on both sides (if the turn is located in the middle of the sentence), and may not be placed at all (if there is an exception to the rule).

In general, many sources say that the turn is always isolated, in any position. This is not true, because there are exceptions, as well as some items that prohibit the setting of punctuation marks with a non-verbal rotation. They are few, no doubt, but they do exist. We will try to understand further what are these cases.

When the gerundive turnover is not detached?

The setting of punctuation marks with a non-participial turnover does not take place if the turn itself merges in meaning with the main action. And when it can not be used?

First, if the main and additional actions are related to different words. Example: "Running distance is faster than everyone, the finished footwear has become unusable". Such a proposal, or rather, the use in this sentence of this participial turnover will be a violation of the syntactic norms. Compare this sentence with the following: "Having run the distance fastest of all, the finisher soon celebrated his triumph."

You can not use the gerundive and gerundive turnover in the event that the impersonal sentence lacks an infinitive. That is, with this design, there is simply nothing to relate. At the same time, in such a sentence there can be a combination composed of a pronoun or a noun playing the role of a complement and a verb-predicate. Example: "Looking at what the weather outside the window, I immediately felt sad." This is also a violation of syntactic norms. It will be correct in this case: "Looking at the weather outside the window, I immediately became sad."

It is forbidden to use a design if it refers to participles of the passive kind. It follows that the subject of the action, which is indicated by the gerund, and the subject of the action, which is expressed by the predicate, do not coincide. Example: "The ball, flying away from the stadium, was still caught." Here the error lies in the fact that one turn refers to the flew ball, and the second turn is already to the people who caught it.

Conclusion

So, what did we find out in the course of this article? First, that punctuation marks in sentences with a gibberish can be placed differently, depending on its location in the sentence. That is, they can stand on one side (if the turnover is at the beginning / end of the sentence), and can stand immediately from two sides (if the turn is located in the middle of the sentence). Secondly, punctuation marks with gerundive and gerundive turnover are set equally. Thirdly, the formulation of punctuation is regulated by syntactic norms. Fourthly, I would like to note at the end the similarity of the production, which punctuation marks have with participial and adverbial participle.