What restrictions on the rights and freedoms of citizens exist? For what purpose are they introduced?

There is no exact list of what restrictions on the rights and freedoms of citizens exist. All of them can be divided into two main categories. One implies mutual respect between people, and the other is aimed at protecting the state as a whole. All these are mandatory requirements for the existence of a stable society. Without such restrictions, mankind would quickly fall into chaos. As social relations developed, more and more different prohibitions arose. At the same time, the obsolete restrictions were gradually disappearing. For example, earlier society was divided into clearly defined groups, such as nobility, peasants and so on. Now there is no such division, that is, there is no restriction of rights and freedoms. The Constitution assumes that absolutely any person is equal to the other and does not differ from anything. This primarily concerns rights and freedoms.

Definition

The interpretation of what exactly is implied by such a prohibition can vary significantly depending on the source. The problem is connected with the fact that, in addition to direct definition, there are also various indirect descriptions and similar factors. If we summarize all available data, we can derive the averaged description. Thus, the restriction of human rights and freedoms is specifically prohibited by law and the limits of opportunities that are necessary to reduce the number of options for various actions. It looks somewhat incomprehensible. If it is easier, all this means the introduction of special laws that will not allow a person to act in harm to himself, the surrounding or the country.

Respect for others

This is one of the options for limiting the rights and freedoms of citizens. In this case, it means that a person can do almost anything, as long as this does not apply, even indirectly, to other members of society. For example, you can safely listen to loud music at home during the day, as it does not bother anyone. But you can not do it at night, because at that time most people are asleep. Naturally, there are also various exceptions, for example, a person can sleep during the day, because at night he works. In such a situation, music will interfere with him in the daytime, but the legislative norms primarily focus on a large number of people. And if you have such a problem, you can always go to your neighbor and ask him to do it quietly, explaining the reasons. In general, the grounds for restricting rights and freedoms are the desire to ensure that different groups, individuals, cells of society and other associations of citizens can coexist with each other without unnecessary conflicts. This is the main goal of prohibitions, which are still more or less successfully coping with their task.

State requirements

This is the second category that describes what restrictions on the rights and freedoms of citizens exist. In this case, it is implied that the state artificially prohibits a person from doing anything that could harm the entire country as a whole. Perhaps no individual citizen would be hurt by such actions, but the state will certainly be harmed. Property, financial or any other - it does not play a role. If the first category is true for all countries, regardless of the territory, then this kind of restrictions has a narrower focus, implying that first of all you need to take into account the interests of your own country and only then any other, neighboring or remote.

Reasonableness of limitations

In the overwhelming majority of cases, regardless of what restrictions on rights and freedoms are used, they are adequate. For example, it is quite logical and correct to prohibit the killing of other people, property theft, robbery and so on. But in some countries there are quite ambiguous restrictions for the population, which can not be called adequate. For example, in the UK, a pregnant woman has the opportunity, if there are no other options, to request from any policeman his helmet. And to send there a little need. Florida excelled the ban exclusively for unmarried women to jump with a parachute. But there is also a caveat: the restriction is valid only on Sunday. The French are forbidden to give a pig name to Napoleon. And this is only a very small part of such restrictions. Naturally, in fact, very few people take all this into account, but since the laws act, they can be used at any time. Similar oddities can be found in almost any country in the world, the main thing is to look good.

Separate areas

This, in essence, restricts human rights and freedoms from a number of those that are aimed at the security of the state as a whole. Nevertheless, given the fact that this includes all kinds of prohibitions in areas of natural disasters and similar situations, the interests of other citizens are also taken into account. For example, forced evictions from homes that are flooded or damaged by fire can save someone's life. But in its essence it is still considered a limitation. Let him and is directed to a good cause, but in theory everyone can decide for himself whether to drown him or not.

Restrictions for different population groups

By the rules, all people are equal. But there are some groups of people for whom there are more prohibitions than for others. Such restrictions on the rights and freedoms of citizens primarily concern prisoners. A person has transgressed the law, on this issue there is a decision that for the continuation of the functioning of society in the previous regime such a person must be isolated. Previously, this kind of problem was solved radically - the death penalty. Now more practice imprisonment for one or another period, depending on the size of the offense.

Unlawful restrictions

Some types of prohibitions go against the law. For example, the detention of an innocent person by law enforcement agencies for no apparent reason. This is the simplest and most widespread version of the unlawful restriction of the rights and freedoms of citizens. There are other options. In some cases, they can be absolutely legal in one country, but inadmissible in another. For example, in Russia you can find a negative attitude towards people of non-traditional orientation, but in Europe they are welcomed, providing all conditions for living. And there are many such situations.

Results

So, if you sum up the limitations of the rights and freedoms of citizens, you can see that they are so numerous that they can not be transferred. These prohibitions surround every person in his daily life constantly. They are needed to ensure that all members of society live more or less normally to minimize the number of conflicts and so on. No country in the world can exist without such prohibitions, since in this case the unlimited society will be completely uncontrollable, which the rulers are not going to allow. Some people think that this is wrong, but there is another opinion that the more rigid the state applies to any violation of rules, the fewer unnecessary freedoms, the better the whole population lives.