Education, History
What does Pestel's Russkaya Pravda say?
Both Murav'ev's Constitution and Russkaya Pravda by Pestel are considered to be one of the main sources on which one can study the convictions of the Decembrists. Officially, only a document written by the head of the Southern Society was adopted.
PI Pestel "Russian Truth": the history of the document
The main points of the "reserve letter" were submitted to the Southern Society and approved by him in 1823. But his full title received this document after a year. Pestel PI worked on his brainchild for four years. He originally intended to write ten chapters, but as a result, there were only five of them: about the tribes inhabiting the country, and about the estates inhabiting it, about the land, and also about the people, both civilly and politically. The main ideas of the new Decembrist Constitution were borrowed from philosophers of the Enlightenment.
"Pravda PI" on the national question
Pavel Ivanovich proposed to divide the entire population of the country into three categories:
1) Slavic tribes.
2) Indigenous Russian people.
3) Tribes attached to Russia.
"Pravda PI" on the rights of citizens
All citizens bear the same responsibility before the law, a new court was introduced for them. Men, from the age of twenty, gain the right to vote. Freedom of religion, movement, assembly, press and speech was envisaged. The inviolability of the home and its owner was guaranteed.
"Russian Truth" Pestel PI on the state issue
Pavel Ivanovich fervently advocated for the establishment of a republic in the country. He was sure that after the overthrow of the tsarist power the state would become an indivisible whole. The plans were to divide Russia into regions (ten), which would consist of five districts or provinces, which in turn were divided into districts or counties, and the latter - at the volost. Nizhny Novgorod was supposed to be called Vladimir and move the capital there.
"Russian Truth" Pestel PI on the land issue
First of all serfdom was planned to be completely abolished. With regard to the arable land Pestel went on a compromise. He enjoined that one half of it should go for social needs, and the second - still remain in the hands of the landlords. Farmers could lease land from owners to organize large farms and thus attract hired workers. Pestel explained this decision by saying that peasants do not have the capital or education necessary for the competent disposal of land. But even with such a seemingly limiting, for that time his project was more than radical.
Similar articles
Trending Now