The Origin of the Moon: versions

The moon is a natural satellite of the Earth, which is the brightest object in the night sky. Since ancient times, it has riveted to themselves the views of people and touched in their souls the most poetic strings. The influence of the Moon on our planet is very great. The most vivid example of this is the sea tides. They arise in connection with the gravitational attraction that the Earth satellite has. In addition, since ancient times people have used the lunar calendar. Throughout almost the entire history of mankind, it was the main method not only for the chronology, but also for orientation in daily affairs. Looking at the lunar calendar, our ancestors decided whether to start sowing or harvesting them, or to organize or not to organize fairs.

The omnipotent church was oriented toward the phases of the moon. According to the compiled calendar, she declared various religious holidays and Great Lent.
For hundreds of years people have been arguing about the origin of the moon. But, despite the rapid development of scientific thought, a huge number of unresolved questions about our only satellite still remained unanswered.

What, in fact, is the origin of the moon? Hypotheses that allow at least somehow to approach this answer are of a scientific nature, and they are just fantastic assumptions.

Folk tradition

There is a legend about the origin of the moon. According to her, in the old days, when it was young even Time itself, a girl lived on our planet. She was so beautiful that everyone who saw her was breathtaking.

In those years, people did not know what anger and hatred were. On Earth, only harmony, mutual understanding and love reigned. Even God was pleased to contemplate the World created by him. It lasted for years, which turned into centuries. The planet was like a blooming fairy tale, and it seemed nothing could overshadow such a beautiful picture.

However, over the years, bathed in the rays of her own success and beauty, the girl changed her modest lifestyle to binge. At night she began to seduce the most beautiful men of the planet, illuminating the darkness with a bright glow. Her behavior became known to God.

He punished the libertine by sending her to the horizon. After that, the girl-moon began to illuminate the beautiful planet with its captivating and pure glow. People began to go out on the night streets to admire the unique beauty that poured from the sky. This gentle light caught fire in the hearts of young men and women, bringing warmth to the soul. Thus, the moon took people's peace. They could no longer sleep at night and fell into her tender trap. The moon presented them with the most inexplicable feelings, forcing the hearts of the earthlings to beat in time with mysterious thoughts and fairy-tale love.

Selena

What is the origin of the name Luna? For example, if we mean a name, then it has Greek roots. In this language the word "selas" means "brilliance", "light", "radiant". Hence the name Luna.

The meaning and origin of Selena are shrouded in myths. In some of them she is a hero connected with the Sun. If you take the works of Aeschylus, then in them Selena is the daughter of Helios. According to other sources, she is his wife or sister. There are myths that say that Selena is the daughter of the titan of Parent and sister of Nekta. In other words, the versions of the ancient tales diverge. The names of Selena also vary in them. In some myths, she is Hyperilla, Ithianassus, Neide, or Chromia.

The usual image of Selena is a winged woman dressed in silver garments with a golden wreath on her head. It is the main one in the night sky and moves along it in its chariot, in which white winged buffaloes, bulls or horses are harnessed.

The origin of the name of the moon is also among the Slavs. In Latin, this is "rune", and in French - lime. These words have an ancient Indo-European root, which means "light" or "luxury".

In the Slavonic language, the meaning of the name Luna is very similar to all previous versions. The origin of the word in this case can be explained by the name of the luminary, like louksna. In translation, this means "shiny" and "bright".

The main riddles of the Earth satellite

After a scrupulous analysis of the physical qualities of our neighbor, many details allow us to express an opinion in favor of the fact that the artificial origin of the moon is still very likely. On the one hand, this theory seems absurd, but on the other - it rests on eight postulates, the analysis of which makes it possible to uncover the curious characteristics of this satellite.

And it is not by chance that this theory of the origin of the Moon, which was put forward in 1960 by Russian researchers Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, did not cease to interest their colleagues in the future. Supporters of the hypothesis of the artificial origin of the Earth satellite hold the view that it was once attracted by the gravitational field of our planet. The moon, in their opinion, could be towed away by someone. And it is quite possible. The chance of capturing the Moon by the Earth is almost zero. After all, our planet is not so large in size compared to its current companion.

The comet theory of the origin of the moon is also incapable of withstanding criticism. After all, all cosmic bodies carry a large amount of volatile substances. However, on the Moon there are practically none. Consequently, it is clearly not of cosmic origin. According to some researchers, the moon is nothing more than a ship of aliens.

Riddle number 1. Mass ratio

If we compare the Moon with other planets in our solar system, then it is distinguished by some abnormal characteristics. For example, the ratio of the masses and sizes of the Moon and the Earth is unusually low. Thus, the diameter of our planet is four times larger than the same parameter of its satellite. In Jupiter, for example, this value is eighty.

Another interesting detail is the distance between the Earth and the Moon. It is relatively small. In this regard, in terms of its visual dimensions, the Moon coincides with the Sun. This is confirmed by such phenomena as the eclipses of our nearest star, when the Earth's satellite completely covers the heavenly Svetilo.

Anomalous for the researchers is the perfectly round orbit of the moon. Other satellites of the solar system rotate along the elliptical path.

Riddle No. 2. The Gravity Center

Researchers note the extraordinary deviation of the Moon. The gravitational center of this satellite is closer to its geometric center by 1800 meters. This can also prove the artificial origin of the moon. Versions of why the satellite of our planet with such a significant discrepancy still rotates in a circular orbit, simply does not exist.

Riddle № 3. Titanium surface

Looking at the photo of the Moon, many are confident that they see craters on its surface. However, in the absence of an atmosphere, the planet does not seem to be much "beaten" by the cosmic bodies that fall on it.

In addition, the lunar craters are so small in comparison with their circumference that it seems that the meteorite fragments hit an extremely durable material. Shcherbakov and Vasin suggested that the lunar surface is made of titanium. This version has been tested. As a result of the data obtained, it can be concluded that the lunar crust has extraordinary properties of titanium to a depth of almost 32 km.

Riddle № 4. Oceans

The artificial origin of the Moon is proved by the giant expansions on its surface, called oceans. Many researchers believe that this is nothing but traces of a solidified lava released from the bowels of the earth after the impact of meteorites. Although all this can only be explained by volcanic activity.

Riddle No. 5. Gravity

The theory of the origin of the Moon as an artificial body is confirmed by the presence on this planet of an inhomogeneous gravitational attraction. This was confirmed by the crew of Apollo VIII. Astronauts noted sharp anomalies of gravity, which in some places mysteriously increased significantly.

Riddle № 6. Craters, oceans, mountains

On the reverse side of the Moon, which is not visible from the Earth, scientists have discovered a large number of craters, geographic upheavals and mountains. However, we can only see the oceans. Such a gravity mismatch also allows one to propose a version that the artificial origin of the Moon takes place.

Riddle number 7. Density

The density of the moon is extremely small. Its value is only 60% of the density of our planet. According to the existing laws of physics, in this case, the Moon should be just hollow. And this is with the relative rigidity of its surface. This is another argument, justifying the artificial origin of the moon.

Scientists have other hypotheses on this score, which together are the eighth postulate. Let us consider them in more detail.

Separation of Matter

The history of the origin of the moon excited people at all times. The first logical explanation for the appearance of this satellite in our planet was in the 19th century. George Darwin. He was the son of Charles Darwin, who put forward the theory of natural selection.

George was a very authoritative and well-known astronomer who devoted a lot of time to studying the heavenly companion of our planet. In 1878, he advanced the theory that the origin of the moon was the result of the separation of matter. Most likely, George Darwin became the first researcher who established the fact that our heavenly satellite is gradually moving away from the Earth. Calculating the speed of the divergence of the planets, the astronomer suggested that in earlier times they were a single whole.

In the distant past, the Earth was a viscous matter and rotated around its axis in just 5.5 hours. This led to the fact that the centrifugal forces "pulled out" part of the substance from the planet. Over time, the moon formed from this piece. On the spot of separation on the Earth appeared the Pacific Ocean.

This origin of the planet Luna was quite reasonable. As a result, the version of J. Darwin took the dominant position in the early 20th century. The theory perfectly explained the similarity of the composition of the lunar and terrestrial rocks, the lesser density of the satellite of our planet and its dimensions.

However, this version in 1920 criticized Harold Jeffries. This British astronomer proved that the viscosity of our planet in a semi-molten state could not promote such a powerful vibration to lead to the appearance of two planets. Against the fact that this was the origin of the moon, hypotheses were put forward by other researchers. After all, it became incomprehensible which laws and phenomena allowed the Earth to accelerate so rapidly, and then sharply reduce the speed of its orbital motion. In addition, it is proved that the age of the Pacific Ocean is about 70 million years. And this is too little to accept the scenario of the appearance of the heavenly satellite proposed by J. Darwin.

Capture the planet

How else could the origin of the moon be explained? Versions were different, but the most explainable of them was the hypothesis, published in 1909 from the pen of Thomas Jefferson Jackson Oy. This American astronomer suggested that in earlier times the Moon was a small planet entering the solar system. However, gradually, under the influence of the gravitational forces acting on it, its orbit took the form of an ellipse and intersected with the orbit of the Earth. Further, our planet with the help of gravity "captured" it. As a result, the Moon moved to a new orbit and became a companion.

This hypothesis is confirmed by a sufficiently high angular momentum. In addition, in favor of this version speak myths of ancient peoples, in which it is asserted that there were times when the Moon did not exist at all.

However, such a scenario was unlikely. When passing near the Earth a small planet, the gravitational forces acting on the cosmic body would rather destroy it or be thrown far enough away. In contrast to this theory is the fact that the lunar and terrestrial surfaces have a certain similarity.

Joint formation

This hypothesis was the main one in the Soviet scientific world. For the first time it was voiced in the writings of Kant as far back as 1775. According to this version, both planets were formed from a single gas-dust cloud. In this trail, the proto-Earth originated, which gradually gained a large mass. As a result, particles of the cloud began to rotate around our planet, adhering to their own orbits. Some of them fell on the Earth not yet formed to the end and increased it. Others took circular orbits and, being at the same distance from our planet, formed the Moon.

This hypothesis is fully explained by the fact that the Earth and the Moon have the same age, similar breeds and much more. However, the origin of such a high angular momentum and atypical slope of the orbital plane of our satellite is unknown. It seems strange that the simultaneously formed planets have different ratios of the mass of the core and shells, and also the cause of the disappearance of light elements from the heavenly satellite.

Evaporation of matter

This hypothesis was put forward by researchers in the early 20th century. According to this version, under the influence of constant hits on the Earth's surface of cosmic particles, its surface has undergone a strong heating. There was a melting of the substance, which soon began to evaporate. Further, the effect of blowing light elements by the solar wind began. The heavier particles passed the process of condensation with time. This happened at some distance from the Earth, where the Moon was formed.

This version explains well the small core of the heavenly satellite, the similarity of the rocks of the two planets, as well as the low number of volatile light elements present on it. However, how can we explain the high angular momentum? In addition, it is already known that the Earth was not heated up. Consequently, there was simply nothing to evaporate.

Megaimpackt

All the theories about the origin of the Moon that existed until the mid-1970s for one reason or another could not find complete confirmation. At the same time, there was an almost unthinkable situation when the researchers simply could not give an answer to the question of the origin of our only satellite. This uncertainty became the main impetus for the birth of the new version.

A relatively young hypothesis of the origin of the Moon is the collision theory. It appeared in 1975, and now it is considered the main one. According to this version, the birth of the Moon and the Earth occurred in those distant times when the solar system itself emerged from the gas-dust cloud. At the same time, it turned out that at the same distance from the heavenly Sun, two planets immediately formed, which turned out to be in the same orbit. One of them is the young Earth. The other was Teiya's planet. Both celestial bodies gradually grew. Further, their masses became so tangible that the planets began to approach each other gradually. Theia was smaller than Earth, and so began to gravitate toward a heavier neighbor. According to researchers, the fateful meeting took place 4.5 billion years ago. Theia collided with the Earth. The blow was strong, but occurred on a tangent. The earth as it turned out inside out. A part of the mantle of our planet and a large part of Tayi "splashed out" into the near-earth orbit. This substance and became the germ of the future Moon, the final formation of which occurred about a hundred years after this collision. At impact, the Earth received a great moment of momentum.

Explains the hypothesis and a small-sized lunar core, and the similarity of the rocks of the two planets. However, it is not entirely clear why the final evaporation of light elements, which, albeit in small numbers, but is present in the lunar crust, did not occur.

Facts documentary

All materials about the Moon, which are widely available, are far from exhaustive information. What are the secrets of this planet? What is the origin of the moon? A documentary about the events taking place on the satellite of our planet immediately interested the audience. It came out under the title "The sensation of the century. Moon. Hiding the facts. " It tells that mysterious and in no way explainable phenomena occur on this cosmic body. And this is confirmed by the testimony of astronomers. Especially often on the moon, researchers see wandering and stationary lights, bright flash flashes, light from the craters of extinct volcanoes and incomprehensible rays that cut through the depressions of the lunar surface.

Also, according to many scientists, the Americans did not land at all on the surface of this celestial body. And if they landed, the materials presented in free access are a blatant forgery. The reason for this disbelief lies in the fact that the missions that were carried out did not go as planned. In addition, the astronauts, who used to be on the moon, asserted somewhat later and only in personal conversations that all their actions were under constant observation. It was carried out with constantly circling around the ship unidentified flying objects.

This fully explains the artificial origin of the satellite and the version that the Moon is a ship of aliens. The theory of a hollow, potentially hollow planet also finds its explanation.