Joomla or WordPress? Which is better: Joomla or WordPress?

Today, no one is surprised that almost every second active Internet user owns his own website. This state of affairs is largely due to the fact that now there is no need to know the HTML markup well, and the programmer is absolutely not necessary.

How did this become possible? Everything is simple - now for all this, the site management systems, better known as CMS, are responsible. The most famous are Joomla and WordPress. They gained popularity because of their simplicity and focus on the most inexperienced users. Create with their help you can even very complex sites, not just the simplest author's pages.

What is a CMS?

If you decrypt this term, then in the English version you get the Content Manager System. In Russian, this means a specialized system for managing content on the site. Where CMS is often referred to as the "Site Engine".

Speaking very simply, this term means a special program that the webmaster installs on hosting. This is a "layer" between the owner of the site (administrator), hosting system and users.

The most important component of any such system is the database. What is it? If you do not delve into the disclosure of concepts, then almost any extended table can be called that way.

In the cells of such a "table" the name of each publication is recorded, its contents, comments and other important information are entered in the appropriate fields. Using the web interface, the site owner can make changes to the structure of the database. When a specific page is opened in the user's browser, the content management program simply extracts all the necessary information from the database, and then adds it to the pre-prepared template.

So all the pages of the site are drawn. The huge advantage of this kind of system is the fact that you can completely change the design of the portal at any time, and its actions will in no way affect its content. To make the same new information is not more difficult than working with your page in a social network.

Flour choice

Many are asked an important and painful question: "Joomla or WordPress? Which engine is better and more reliable? "We will try to give a detailed answer in this article.

Immediately warn you that you will not get a clear answer. Both systems are good in their own way, and therefore we will only talk in more detail about the advantages and disadvantages of each engine.

To somehow determine, you need to know at least about the preferred places of use of each of these engines. In simple terms, you have to clearly imagine what is best for your home page, and what is better to use to create a small social network.

So Joomla or WordPress? Let's start to understand more!

A bit about Joomla

What can this engine be used for? It Joomla is perfect for your own social network project, as well as for the development of a corporate website of the "medium hand" enterprise. Do you need a high-quality information and entertainment portal? Not a problem, this engine will cope well with this task. By the way, it is on Joomla that such popular online-cinemas are being created recently.

In general, if you need a really big site, with lots of photos and videos, then Jumla will often be the only optimal choice. In addition, Joomla templates from famous designers are not as expensive as similar work for WordPress.

As for the extensibility of functionality, then in this matter this engine is better than its competitor. There are thousands of widgets, and Joomla modules do not require any knowledge of programming for their installation. If you talk about WordPress, then to expand the functionality of the site you will have to practice in the development of PHP.

The controllability of the various elements of the page is also the strength of Jumla. In this case, the administrator can edit almost all the content, while in WordPress for the same purposes you have to buy a paid template, and even choose its Russian version, because otherwise it will be very difficult to understand it.

Many site creators speak warmly of the Joomla menu. In this respect, this CMS is far behind its competitor. A lot of different categories, and you can create new ones and edit existing ones. In the case of WordPress, everything is not so simple. There are only "Categories" and "Pages", than the functional is actually limited.

SEO

If you want to receive profit from your site (and who does not want!), Then at this point will have to pay special attention. "Jumla" is a great engine, but its capabilities in terms of search engine optimization are somewhat curtailed.

WordPress is literally ideal for creating sites that in the long term will be able to take the best results of Google and Yandex search results. Of course, this does not eliminate the need for long and hard work with content and the inclusion of the necessary keywords in it.

The main disadvantages of Jumla

Of course, there are certain drawbacks in this container with honey. Let's talk about them in more detail.

First of all, not all users like the device directly template. In particular, it has a huge number of elements that need to be removed for comfortable work with the site.

Of course, you have to do everything manually. Important! In order to do this normally, you need to know HTML fairly well, since otherwise it is simply unrealistic to understand this pile. And in this case you will need a lot of time for editing. In general, Joomla templates are far from intuitive understandability, so you will have to work a lot.

Speed is our problem!

Secondly, the speed of downloading sites on "Jumla" is far from cosmic. It happens that not even an overloaded portal, located on a powerful server, is loaded in four seconds! Just a nightmare. It is necessary to shovel half of the template, after which the time is reduced to one and a half to two seconds. And even this is far from ideal, as the site should normally be fully loaded in less than a second.

In many respects, this negative feature is due to the fact that Jumla creates a huge number of folders on the FTP server, which has a very negative effect on the speed of indexing the resource, and if the user uses a stunted GPRS or EDGE channel, downloading the site does not become an unrealistic event at all.

A little about attendance ...

This defect is just completely devoid of WordPress. Hosting for it can be bought much cheaper. This is due to the fact that it may not have high performance: the engine will still provide an acceptable speed of loading pages in the browser.

Finally, with a really high attendance of the site engine can not stand. Of course, when organizing a banal home page you are unlikely to have problems, but "for the future" it should be taken into account.

If you think that in the dispute "Joomla or WordPress" we took the side only of the second engine, then this is not so. "Jumla" - a great option in many cases, but you need to remember some of its weaknesses.

A little bit about WordPress ...

This engine is known to everyone who has anything to do with the creation of websites. Note that WordPress in recent years is experiencing a real "boom" of prevalence, because it is ideal for creating blogs and personal sites.

However, on this example of its use is not even exhausted. On the Internet, millions of sites on the "Press", and not all of them are blogs. You can even find online-cinemas, although they are not a good role for this engine. Recently, there are even a bunch of commercial sites, many of which are located in the top of the search engines.

In general, there are lots of options, but WordPress templates are more often used to create personal blogs. By the way, it is this version of the use of this engine is considered the most optimal. We will try to explain in more detail the reason for such a recommendation.

Some disadvantages

Surprised that the "debriefing" we begin with the minuses of WordPress? There are simply not so many of them, and therefore it is best to discuss them first.

The huge drawback of the engine is its weak security. And these are not empty words: it was repeatedly noticed that the percentage of hacking of those sites is high, in the role of CMS on which WordPress is used. In general, the protection of your portal in this case will have to be puzzled yourself, and we would not recommend saving on this issue.

Other negative features

Are there any other negative aspects of WordPress? Installation and configuration of this system are simple, which can not be said about the possibilities of making drastic changes in the structure of the site.

If you carefully read the part of the article that talked about the advantages of "Jumla", then for sure you can independently guess the disadvantages of its competitor. Firstly, WordPress is much more difficult in terms of deep configuration of the site. To make something more complicated than standard operations, you will need considerable experience and knowledge in PHP. In complex cases, you will have to contact specialists, since you yourself are unlikely to achieve anything.

However, there were no more minuses as such. Now we would like to raise the question of the positive features of this engine. They are much more than negative.

WordPress strengths

To begin with, WordPress templates can be edited by almost a schoolboy. All of their devices are intuitively understandable, for a long time you will not have to deal with anything. In any case, the average user copes with this for ten minutes at most.

WordPress itself, the topics for which in incredible quantities are already available on the developer's site, is very laconic and beautiful. Yes, it is difficult to make something out of it, but "out of the box" is practically a fully functional and functional system.

In addition, the average blog load time rarely exceeds one and a half seconds. If the speed of the Internet connection is normal, it can be within 0.7 seconds. On the thematic forums there are many tips for further speeding up the site, so if you want, you can make it almost lightning fast.

Main conclusions

So Joomla or WordPress? Which engine is best for creating a website? Let's go back to the beginning of the article. Then we just said that we can not give any unequivocal recommendation. If you carefully read the article, you yourself can understand it.

"Jumla" is good for large and substantial sites. There are some problems with the number of folders and the speed of content download, but this is completely compensated by the huge functionality of the engine and the ability to create really large portals.

In general, according to the functional as such, Joomla significantly outperforms the competitor. Many webmasters believe that it is ideal for beginners, since it allows you to "get under the hood", adjusting at its discretion literally all the parameters of your page.

On the other hand, many people like WordPress. User comments indicate that a very serious blog can be built even by a person who did not previously have any experience in creating web pages.

"WordPress" is ideal for blogs and small home pages. It is characterized by a high download speed and simplicity, but for serious projects you will either have to buy a paid template, or independently improve in the knowledge of PHP.

In conclusion

So, to answer the question: "What is better, Joomla or WordPress?" - it is not possible, because each one solves for himself independently, based on his own needs.

Currently, there is a tendency that most of the masters use WordPress. This is due to the simplicity of its installation. There is practically no need for any complex initial settings, many free themes, and the community is quite active.

As for the last point, we did not accidentally mention the community. If you have any problems, you can always hope to find a solution on the developer forum. Of course, for this it is preferable to know English at least on an average level.

In addition, patches and updates are constantly coming out for this platform, which successfully fix the previously found errors. As a consequence, this CMS is very stable and reliable. However, Joomla in this regard is only slightly worse, but its security is much higher.

In a word, you need to choose only! The good thing is that both of the systems we are considering will be able to cope with almost everything.