Who are the morals and why do not they like them?

Who are the Moralphages? These are people who blame others for immorality. That is, they are moralists who impose their "right" opinion on other people. The very concept of "moralphag" originated on the Internet, when image-board resources (such as "dvach") became popular.

Definition

What does "moralphag" mean? It is a fanatical, irrational dogmatist who does not share the notion of human rights and freedom. At least, this definition is published on "imidzhaborah."

Who are the "moralphages"? Why do not they like them?

The word "moralphag" is commonly referred to as Internet slang. This expression originated in the west (on the same "imagebards"), and the post-Soviet public was simply popularized. On the Internet, there are many humorous resources, where there is absolutely no censorship and moral values. All the content does not pass the filtering, and therefore there can often be found, the so-called shock-content. The ideology of such resources, as a rule, lies in the fact that all users should be anonymous. There is also an unspoken rule - "the user to some extent knows what kind of content can be here." Therefore in such places "moralphages" are not welcomed, and generally do not like. After all, there is absolutely no sense in their moralizing and indignation towards the rest of the townsfolk of this or that forum. The question arises: "Why did you come here if you know that you will complain?" Such resources are created for the interested people to communicate with each other and share information (usually informal), and when someone interferes with them A corresponding reaction is born.

Identification

If you are interested in the question of who these morals are, then know that the favorite topics for discussing these "Internet citizens" are: the problems of sexual minorities, the prohibition of abortion and surrogate motherhood, the practice of euthanasia, insulting the feelings of believers, the ban on pornography and much more. As you can see, the themes are already resonant. "Moralists", just the same and adore over all this argue and take an opposition opinion.

And in conclusion about who such moralfagi, we can say: these people believe that their subjective "morality" coincides with the universal. In practice, however, the moral rights of people in many respects diverge, because all people are partly different. Of course, some general rules exist, but not all will argue in the event of a small discrepancy or disagreement. And the "moralphag" will fight until the last, especially if the entire story happens on the Internet.