Old Songs About the Main: Parties, People, Money

It is clear that democracy does not unite people: private property violates equality in society, expensive lawyers violate equality in court, copyright restricts freedom of information and access to culture and science.

The state has not served people for a long time, it has lost its meaning and significance, it divides people and catches profit in this. Not a ton of coal is valuable in society, although it heats everyone, and a ton of dough, it's a loot source of taxes for the state and has an entertaining value. It's not that valuable that brings real benefits, but something that can entertain the rich.

Not a miner becomes a millionaire, but a footballer, not a hero, but an actor who embodied it on the screen, not a seamstress who dresses thousands of people, but a fashion designer. All because the real good does not entertain the rich, but pop, fashion, cinema entertains them.

The rich determined the game value of life for us, the coefficient of high, it determines the values of life and the exchange rate. People can rot in basements, but it does not matter when the world championship or a fashion show is ahead. Then you can play on the stock exchange, throwing people into the firebox like chips.

The parties are commercial enterprises, the raw materials for which are the souls of voters. The party is getting sponsors, legal addresses, political interests, and we are offered to vote for it. Parties for society are useless, democracy for society is useless. They only disperse forces in different directions and turn real intentions into dust.

Only the excitement of the "erogenous zones" of the rich is of use, or rather not of benefit, but of the crumbs of their feast. The society is turned into a prostitute, the rich man is beaten, get a handout. The state also became a prostitute when it ceased to maintain itself and sat down on taxes.

Defects move the underworld, but the modern world took vices as the driving force, so he himself is criminal in nature. The modern state does not rely on its citizens, it is in the service of those who keep it. The bankers, businessmen, shareholders are for whom the state works.

Soon our country will wage commercial war, because the state does not own anything, and the interests of the corporation turn into the interests of the state. The state is independent only when resources are in its hands, and business is separated from the state.

The task of the state is to provide the state standard of living for citizens with their own forces, rather than creating conditions for business that subordinates citizens and the state to their goals. Is Gazprom a national treasure? It is more important for the benefit of shareholders. Is art created on copyright owned by the people? Is it possible to call such artists popular?

The fact that the "box" twist is a reflection of the close requests of people who have the money and the benefits of producers. Began to appear and not bad samples of creativity, because the surplus of money is already oozing and something that falls and people, but again not in the form of affordable prices, kindergartens, but in successful films. Razvekalovka is above all and more expensive than all. But these art samples will, perhaps, be worthy of the prize at the festival, but will remain one-time and will be forgotten in the next season.

If the wealthy kayfolovs come into fashion working clothes, life in hostels, then only GDP will not be at odds with people's lives. Here, or their dependence on pleasures to subordinate the demands of society, to make it in a trend, or to society itself, to protect the right of the majority to a decent life. There is no other way. Rich kayfolovy will bring the world to the end of the world. An inadequate worker with a screwdriver is one thing, and a millionaire with a private army is different. All wars from unlimited private interest, and unrestrained price increases from him.

You can not do everything with the state, but you can not turn everything into a business. To mine, the state ownership is less dangerous, as it is separated from direct benefit and greed, but the counterweight is needed both for business and the state. A clean state is harmful and a clean market is harmful.