NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 graphics card: review, description, specifications and reviews

One of the most significant novelties of 2010 in the segment of mid-level video cards was NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465. This graphic accelerator was based on the semiconductor base of more advanced solutions - ZHTIX 470 and ZHTIX 480. But unlike them, the cost of this product was significantly lower. All this in the aggregate made this decision one of the best mid-level video cards in the niche.

The history of the product

The upper segment of the graphics accelerators at the time of the NVidia Geforce GTX 465 was occupied by "ZHTIX 470" and "ZHTIX 480". These were the most productive solutions, which provided the highest possible level of video card performance in a single-chip layout. Below the hierarchy was the GTX 465. The difference between these devices was the number of blocks involved, the number of which was least of all precisely the hero of this review - "ZHTIX 465". Even lower on the step was located "ZHTIX 460". This video card was already based on an entirely different semiconductor chip. Her parameters were more modest, but here's the energy efficiency - an order of magnitude better.

Contents of delivery

The bundle in this model of the graphics accelerator is as follows:

• Graphical accelerator.

• Disk with software (drivers, specialized programs).

• Manual.

• Warranty card.

In some cases, this list was supplemented with special adapters for creating configurations with several adapters. The most interesting solution in this regard was MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 with the prefix GE +. In the package of additional software in this case included a utility of its own design, which allowed in some situations to unlock the unused computer blocks and due to this turn this product from the GTX 465 into a more productive GTX 470.

Parameters of technical plan of graphic accelerator

The characteristics of the GeForce GTX 465 are impressive at that time, but they are typical for the solution of the average level. The semiconductor crystal itself was manufactured using 40 nm technology. Its area was 526 mm ² , and the number of transistors - 3200 million pieces. And the maximum power in this case is 200 watts. In turn, streaming processors had this graphics accelerator 352, and texture units - 44, rendering blocks - 32. The nominal clock speed of the accelerator was 600 MHz, and the frequency of the operating memory - 3200 MHz. The bit width of the random access memory is 256 bits. The accelerator itself is optimized for PCI Express 2.0. Well, the most recent supported version of DirectX is 11.0.

Memory

Under the use of RAM standard "GDDR5" was accelerated accelerator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465. Its characteristics pointed to a 256-bit bus. It was this factor that was the limiting factor that did not allow it to approach the more powerful GTX 470 already with a 320-bit RAM bus in terms of performance level. In this case, the younger model in the person of GTX 460 had already the same bit width of the operative memory - 256 bits. But the more modest parameters of the GTX 460 itself made it possible to get a certain advantage in terms of speed, namely GTX 465. The recommended amount of RAM in this case was 1 Gb, and its clock frequency was 3200 MHz. All this in the aggregate allowed to get throughput of about 102 Gb / s.

Overclocking

Any NVIDIA Geforce GTX 465 graphics card was equipped with a high-quality cooling system. Therefore, as a rule, there were no problems with overclocking in this case. The only important condition is the presence of a power unit with increased power, the minimum value of which in this case should be equal to 750 W. Otherwise, it should be noted that the overclocking potential of the GTX 465 is much better than that of the older models in the face of the GTX 470 and GTX 480. This nuance is easily explained by the reduced number of involved blocks, which are least of all in the younger model. As a result, with base frequencies of 607 MHz for a chip and 3200 MHz for memory, you can get 825 MHz and 4,040 MHz, respectively. As a percentage, this is about 35 percent. Such an increase is not enough to cover the difference between the GTX 465 and the older model, but this will significantly reduce the backlog.

Analogues

As noted earlier, direct competitors in the camp of "green" graphics cards for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 There were models GTX 460 and GTX 470, between which the level of performance and located this accelerator. The first of them was a more affordable solution, it could not be so rare to meet in the PC at that time. The second one closed the initial level of the premium segment. The price he had was appropriate. On the side of ATI, the competitor was only one - HD 5830. From the standpoint of value, it also belonged to this price category. But its performance on the background of the GTX 460 and GTX 465 was not impressive. Therefore, the best video card in this niche at the time was rightfully considered to be the GTX 465.

Tests

Almost in all tests, the GTX 465 did not leave any competitors in the face of the GTX 460 and Radeon HD5830. For example, the popular at that time toy Call of Duty version of Modern Warfare 2 showed the following results in a resolution of 1920x1200: for the GTX 465 37 frames per second, the GTX 460 for 32, and for the HD5830 for 35. If you overclocked the graphics accelerators, you could get 47 images per second for the first accelerator (chip and memory frequencies, respectively, were 825 MHz and 4040 MHz), 39 for GTX 460 (850 MHz and 4280 MHz) and 40 for HD5830 (915 MHz and 5200 MHz). Despite the fact that the frequencies of the latest video cards were higher, in performance they significantly lost the GTX 465. It was the improved architecture of the semiconductor chip of the graphics accelerator and allowed it to win with more modest frequency parameters from its direct competitors.

The second important factor is the improved overclocking potential, which allowed to get 30-35 percent additional speed. A similar situation was in the StarCraft 2 version of Wings of Liberty. The first place in 1920x1200 mode was occupied by the same GTX 465. His number of frames in the basic mode was 75, and overclocking allowed to increase this value to 76. The second place was occupied by GTX 460 with 74 and 75 respectively. Well, the decision "ATI" generally failed. Its values were equal to 49 and 56. The above distributions by the number of frames per second were true for most of the toys of that time. The first place in this case was consistently occupied by solutions based on the GTX 465. The remaining two products in this niche with variable success occupied the second, then the third place. And the advantage in this case was on the side of the GTX 460. The only plus that could be countered to its competitors solution from ATI is energy efficiency. All the rest was on the side of NVIDIA.

The cost of the device and reviews about it

The NVIDIA Geforce GTX 465 graphics card could not be cheap initially. The price recommended by the manufacturer was $ 280. Given the positioning of this decision in this price tag, there is nothing unusual. The main drawback of this card is a high power of 200 watts. Against the backdrop of the power of the younger model in 160 W this figure looks really overpriced. But on the other hand, it is necessary to take into account the fact that they belong to different families of products. They even have different modifications of semiconductor crystals used. In other respects, the predominance is predominantly on the side of the model with index 465. This is a higher level of performance in the basic mode, and excellent overclocking potential, and even the possibility of unlocking unused modules in some cases. Whatever it was, but at a comparable cost, the technical parameters look better for the 465 model. This is exactly what the owners of this product say.

Results

One of the best mid-level accelerators in 2010 was the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 graphics card. Against the backdrop of the younger model with the 460 index, it had a higher level of performance. But energy efficiency for this reason could not boast. From the position of the same "price / performance ratio" in this segment, it was beyond competition. Most tests in different modes are once again directly confirmed.