Nuclear Forces of Russia and the United States

We are used to being skeptical about the information that flows from all sources to us. In principle, its authors themselves are to blame. Too many "scarecrows" compose, trying to scare the people. Among this terrible whirlwind there is only one topic that thinking people take seriously. These are the nuclear forces of Russia, our shield and the guarantee of a peaceful life. Such things should not be taken lightly. Let's discuss them seriously.

Historical reasons for the emergence of the situation

Our world, from a political point of view, is built on parity. This situation developed after the superpowers acquired their own atomic bombs. As they say today, since then, as a result of the work of a large number of scientists and specialists on both sides, equilibrium has been established. This does not mean that the bombs of the superpowers were equally divided. The bottom line is that the strategic nuclear forces of Russia and the United States, the comparison of which was carried out almost continuously, could together destroy the planet and another ten of its twins if they existed in nature. This circumstance forced the politicians to transfer the confrontation to a different plane. It's just that people realized that they are spending resources on the death of humanity. And why such a victory over a rival who will not bring triumph? The result everyone knows. The USSR was destroyed. However, on the parity of armaments this, by and large, did not affect much. Since the nuclear forces of Russia, the assignees of the Soviet Union were immediately formed.

And why, in fact, do we need such weapons?

We will put down all efforts and cunning, aimed at destroying the parity that existed in the last century. This is a separate topic about the intrigues of our "partners". At the present moment, only the fact of the preservation of nuclear weapons in Russia matters . As before, it is a guarantee of the peaceful existence of its citizens. Russia's nuclear forces frighten NATO generals, restraining their hypothetically aggressive plans. Frankly speaking, they do not state such in open sources, but they do not deny their existence either. However, any attempts in the direction of the Russian Federation stumble upon the simple fact that it is a serious weapon, including a very formidable one. I have to think many times before I do anything. After all, a rocket with a very terrible "stuffing" can land on the territory of the aggressor.

What you need to consider when calculating

All of the above is usually voiced by politicians who have their own methods. The military conducts other "games" according to its rules. Namely, they compare not just the number of warheads, but also their quality and specificity. Here it is necessary to understand that, for example, Russia's strategic nuclear forces are suitable for a "retaliatory strike", and, more simply, for an offensive operation. Note that such a doctrine is not considered. But we understand that such missiles are not meant to defend the country, but to respond to the aggressor on its territory. There are also so-called nuclear deterrent forces of Russia and the United States. These are different systems. They are designed to intercept and destroy enemy warheads. It turns out that the comparison is in many ways. Although we are presented in the press most often a direct calculation of the number of charges and carriers (at best).

Why not take into account other nuclear powers?

It's also an important question. After all, the nuclear club is not that small. According to some information, it includes eight or nine states, and maybe more. Inaccuracies are due to the fact that not all countries recognize the ability to produce nuclear warheads. Israel, for example, believes that it is better to fog on this issue to exploit and take advantage of the unknown. But the point is not even that. The fact is that the nuclear forces of Russia and the United States are comparable among themselves. Each power has a triad. That is, its charges can be launched from the ground (intercontinental missiles), air (airplanes) and the sea (nuclear submarines). Other countries have not yet acquired such power. And they do not plan in the foreseeable future. As they say, there is a crisis in the yard, and a lot is needed to create nuclear technologies. They simply do not exist.

Nuclear Forces of Russia and the USA: Comparison

It should be noted that there is a treaty between the powers, according to which they exchange information on available funds. So, according to this document, each side has approximately the same number of warheads. To be precise, the US has 1642 deployed and 912 canned; Russia has 1643 and 911, respectively. This is official data released in September 2014 by the Pentagon. It is necessary to understand that simple figures do not tell anything about the present state of affairs. Yes, they look like some equality of forces. But experts prefer to delve into the details. For example, to watch how some missiles are carried, how far they can fly, how much they are protected.

Interesting fact

The Pentagon announced that the nuclear forces of Russia and the United States (2014) are approximately equal. However, there immediately appeared information, which nullified this statement. Journalists have unearthed data about exactly what technologies are used by the US for ballistic missiles (they are considered the main threat). It turned out that they use liquid fuel. And it, first, is very expensive to maintain. Secondly, it becomes unsuitable with time. In the overseas media outbreak a scandal, echoes of which still walk through the network. Experts argue that US missiles are no longer capable of making an intercontinental flight. It is clear that none of the generals of such does not confirm. Whatever happened in reality with missiles, they will "blow their cheeks" and remain silent, so as not to disclose state secrets. By the way, many are mowing about Russia's nuclear forces. Those wishing to criticize them, using allegedly insider information, are many.

The liberal conjectures?

Some time ago, the expert community was actively concerned about the question of whether Russia would restore order in its nuclear forces. I want to ask: what do you care? This is a topic that is a state secret. The President repeatedly told citizens about the funds planned for the rearmament of the army. Is it really necessary for everyone to talk about military secrets? It's just stupid. But the thoughtful viewer of the news will learn all that is needed to "sleep peacefully." During the period from 2014 to 2015, as many military exercises were conducted as the USSR did not allow itself even in the most difficult years. If you remove all the gossip and speculation from the ether, then the excuse to worry like it will disappear by itself. We are shown on the screen openly that our rockets are flying. That is, there is more to respond to the threat.

Different missiles and technologies

Even when familiarized with the Pentagon data in the eye rises inequality in the carriers and parity in charges. It says that Russia has 528 nuclear weapons. The United States has more than 266 units. All triad missiles are counted here. It's strange, is not it? There is no equality. After all, the States can expose against Russia more carriers. It turns out the whole thing is in the details. After all, the means on which the warheads are placed were constructed autonomously, without the exchange of data between scientists. We, as decent people, will not think about intelligence and espionage. Whatever it was, it turned out that the technology of potential opponents is different. Let's look at it more closely.

US Nuclear Forces

The triad consists of ground minutemen, submarines Trident-2 and aircraft-bombers. Ballistic missiles carry from one to three warheads. The United States shows them 450 units. About 1000 are hidden in the depths of the ocean on submarines such as "Ohio." In all, they are on duty 14, each carrying 24 missiles. Still there are bombers. All in all, as the Pentagon admits, there are 230 units. If you are interested in types, here they are: В-52Н, В-1В and В-2А. It is said that about fifty aircraft are conserved in warehouses. Each bomber is counted for one warhead, although they are capable of carrying more. However, in the START-3 treaty they decided not to waste time on trifles. It is still necessary to consider the fact that it is possible to use both cruise missiles and bombs on air carriers.

Our funds

Russia has its own "complexes". Even a joke such is, that it is not necessary to be embarrassed. In total, 186 "Topol" and "Topol-M" installations are shown in statistics. The former are located in mines, the latter are mobile. They carry one charge. As recent tests have shown, it is quite possible to fly to the "enemy". There is also "Yars". They are distinguished by the ability to separate and individually guide warheads. They are said to be of the order of three dozen or more. In addition, Russia on duty is "Voevody" with ten homing charges. Their military is characterized by such an abbreviation: RGCH IN. It means that ten charges from this carrier can strike for different purposes. In addition, there is a six-charge "Stiletto". We have only eight submarines so far. They are equipped with "Bulava" complexes. And the bombers - 66.

Our surprises to potential adversaries

Next, we turn to the data, the reliability of which no one will insist. They say, however, that in the Pentagon they are treated with respect. And the point is that these missiles will not be a threat to the enemy, if not to give them the opportunity to fly to the goal. In other words, it is not enough to develop strategic forces, it is also necessary to have missile defense. We heard about the American. What only journalists do not write about this. No one has seen their defense in action. And Russia has already experienced missiles (non-nuclear), which can escape from any now known missile defense system. They carry up to ten warheads, capable of separating and going each to their own goal. At the same time they are not afraid of natural obstacles such as mountains. The trajectory of the missile flight also does not lend itself to digital analytics. So say the "experts".

Case in the Black Sea

And finally, we are invited to recall the strange events that took place on April 12, 2014. They were mentioned by V. Putin in the film "The President". Namely, he spoke about how the American ship made an "unplanned maneuver" and, frankly speaking, escaped from the Crimean coast when he felt himself under the sights of the Russian complex "Bastion". It turns out that this is quite uncomfortable when you can be shot at any moment. In addition, it is rumored that this long-suffering destroyer still could not repel an "attack" of a simple SS. His electronics suddenly completely failed. This was a revelation and a shock to the US military sailors. And I remembered this in this connection. Of course, the correlation between the nuclear forces of Russia and the United States is extremely important. But there are more important things. This refers to the development and implementation of protective technologies that would not allow a potential opponent (that is, a "partner") to use his formidable arsenal. Agree, this is more useful and useful. And most importantly: there will be no unnecessary and such terrible deaths!