Intel vs AMD processors: analysis and comparison of models

In this material, a comparison will be made between the processor products of the two leading semiconductor chip manufacturers: Intel vs AMD. They will also review their current computing platforms, identify their strengths and weaknesses. Well, in addition to this, the possible configurations of computers will be given.

The main current x86 processor connectors

To date, each of the leading manufacturers of central processors has 2 current processor connectors. The company "Intel" is:

• Socket LGA 2011-v3. This combined processor socket is aimed both at assembling high-performance personal computers for computer enthusiasts and servers. The key "chip" of this platform is the RAM controller, which can work in 4-channel mode, and this important feature provides unprecedented performance to processor products. It should also be noted that the integrated graphics subsystem is not used within this platform. To reveal the potential of such high-performance chips can only discrete graphics and it is to use this class of computer components and focuses the LGA 2011-v3 processor connector .

• Данная вычислительная платформа позволяет организовывать как ПК бюджетного уровня, так и высокопроизводительные вычислительные системы. Socket LGA 1151. This computing platform allows you to organize both a budget-level PC and high-performance computing systems. In this case, the RAM controller can function as much as possible in the 2-channel mode. оснащен интегрированной видеокартой, которая отлично «впишется» в офисный или бюджетный системный блок. Also, almost every CPU in the LGA 1151 is equipped with an integrated video card that perfectly "fits" into an office or budget system unit. но выигрывает у любого из решений АМД. In performance, this socket loses the previously considered LGA 2011-v3, but wins any of AMD's solutions. ХХХ, то преимущество, как в производительности, так и в энергоэффективности, будет именно за продукцией первой компании. Therefore, if you compare Intel i5 vs AMD FX-8 ХХХ, then the advantage, both in performance and in energy efficiency, will be just behind the products of the first company.

In turn, AMD actively promotes the following processor connectors for today:

• The main computing platform for this developer of microprocessor devices is AM 3+. которые могут включать от 4 до 8 вычислительных модулей. The most productive CPUs within its framework are FX chips , which can include 4 to 8 compute modules. может максимально функционировать в двухканальном режиме. The memory controller in AM3 +, as in LGA 1151, can function as much as possible in a two-channel mode. а вот LGA 1151 может похвастаться поддержкой уже новейшей и наиболее быстродействующей DDR4. Only in this case we are talking about the support of the outdated RAM standard - DDR3, but the LGA 1151 boasts support for the latest and fastest DDR4. ХХХ, то даже флагманские решения последней будут существенно проигрывать по производительности. Therefore, if we compare the most recent Intel i5 vs AMD FX-9 ХХХ, then even the flagship solutions of the latter will significantly lose in performance. Also within the framework of this platform there is support for the integrated graphics subsystem. LGA 1151, встроенное графическое ядро в этом случае водит в состав материнской платы, а не интегрировано в полупроводниковый кристалл ЦПУ. But, in contrast to the same LGA 1151, the integrated graphics core in this case leads to the motherboard, and not integrated into the semiconductor chip of the CPU.

• FM2 +. The most recent for today AMD's processor connector is FM2 +. Its main niche is inexpensive multimedia stations, office or ultrabudgetary computers. FM2+ - это очень производительная интегрированная подсистема, которая по быстродействию может на равных конкурировать с дискретными видеокартами начального уровня и существенно опережает продукты такого класса у «Интел». The main feature of FM2 + is a very efficient integrated subsystem, which can compete on an equal footing with discrete entry-level graphics cards and significantly outperforms Intel's products of this class. But the limiting part of the success of this socket is the weak processor part of this semiconductor solution. неоправданно. Therefore, the use of this connector in the context of the gaming platform, even the entry level, is entirely unjustified.

LGA 1151. Main characteristics

This computing platform currently occupies a dominant position in the stationary computer market, and it provides a significant advantage in comparing Intel vs AMD on the side of the first. And both in quantitative terms and in qualitative terms. встроенным контроллером ОЗУ стандарта DDR4, обязательным наличием графической подсистемы и кеш-памятью, включающей три уровня в обязательном порядке. As it was mentioned earlier, it can boast the following advantages against the background of direct competitors in the person of AM3 + and FM2 +: built-in DDR4 memory controller , mandatory graphics subsystem and cache memory, which includes three levels without fail. , а также их наиболее важные параметры приведены в таблице 1. Если провести прямое сравнение между Intel Core i5 vs AMD серии FX-9 ХХХ, то в подавляющем большинстве задач преимущество будет именно за первым решением. The positioning of the chips within the LGA 1151 , as well as their most important parameters are given in Table 1. If we make a direct comparison between the Intel Core i5 vs AMD FX-9 series, then in the overwhelming majority of tasks the advantage will be just behind the first solution. This is nothing special: the last generation of Intel chips was introduced in the summer of 2015, and AMD in 2012. Therefore, the latter's processor products are quite difficult to compete with Intel's newer and more productive products.

Наиболее важные их характеристики Positioning of chips within LGA 1151. The most important characteristics of them

Processor connector LGA 2011-v3. Technical specifications

Within the framework of this platform, it is impossible to compare Intel vs AMD due to the fact that this socket for performance is out of competition today. изначально разрабатывалась как серверный сокет, но затем модельный ряд чипов Xeon был дополнен Core i7, нацеленными на сегмент уже бытовых ПК с беспрецедентно высоким быстродействием. LGA 2011-v3 was originally developed as a server socket, but then the lineup of Xeon chips was supplemented with Core i7, aimed at the segment of already home PCs with unprecedented high performance. As it was already noted earlier, built-in graphics are not expected in such systems, and the RAM controller has 4 channels at once. разблокированный множитель. Also, the undeniable advantages of this socket include the ability to install a CPU with 6 or even 12 cores, which also have an unlocked multiplier. вычислительных систем позволяет их обладателям не задумываться о требованиях к аппаратному обеспечению ближайшие 3-4 года уж точно. As a result, the performance margin of such computing systems allows their owners not to think about the hardware requirements for the next 3-4 years, for sure. LGA 2011-v3 сравнивать недопустимо. Processors of Intel vs AMD in the context of LGA 2011-v3 are unacceptable. Between them, it's easy to break both in speed and in price. The latter on such PC starts from several thousand dollars. But this is nothing special: this PC is purchased for several years ahead and has excessive performance.

Socket AM3 +. Key Features and Capabilities

It's not quite right to compare Intel Core vs AMD FX processor solutions . If the first are constantly updated and updated, the latter were released in the distant 2012 and since then there have been no changes in the framework of the AM3 + platform. между двумя этими платформами . As a result, the performance difference is simply huge between the two platforms . Core i3. AMD's flagship today can compete on an equal footing only with the chips of the Core i3 series . All processors within AM3 + have an unlocked multiplier, and as a result, they can and should be overclocked. With the most favorable combination of circumstances with such CPUs, you can conquer the bar at 5 GHz. Also, without fail, the composition of this semiconductor crystal includes a 3-level cache. LGA 1151, не может работать с памятью DDR4, а лишь только с DDR3. The controller RAM in this case is 2-channel, but unlike LGA 1151, it can not work with DDR4 memory, but only with DDR3. AMD FX vs Intel “ Кор ” последнего поколения, то перевес у последних в плане быстродействия будет уж очень большим. If we compare AMD FX vs Intel " Kor " last generation, then the advantage in the latter in terms of performance will be very large. The approximate positioning of AM3 + chips for niches is given in the table below.

The positioning of AM3 +

The processor connector FM2 +. The main platform for hybrid AMD chips

It is impossible to compare the processor parts of Intel Core i5 vs AMD A-series with each other. These processors are aimed at solving completely different tasks. The first of them allows you to create high-performance PCs, and the second - multimedia stations. But the situation changes dramatically when comparing graphics subsystems. увы, не может похвастаться мощной интегрированной графической подсистемой, а вот гибридный чип АМД по умолчанию укомплектован видеокартой, которая даже по своим возможностям превосходит даже дискретные акселераторы начального уровня. Core i5, alas, can not boast of a powerful integrated graphics subsystem, but AMD's hybrid chip by default is equipped with a video card that even surpasses even discrete entry-level accelerators in its capabilities. An important feature of this family of chips is that they are equipped with only a cache memory of two levels.

Multimedia stations

Of course, within the niche of multimedia stations, you can compare such CPUs as Intel Core i5 vs AMD A10-XXXX, but this approach is not economically justified. Such computers put forward increased requirements for the graphics subsystem, and are not so demanding on the processor part of the PC. This combination of characteristics can boast of the previously mentioned series of hybrid chips from AMD. Another important feature is the very low cost, which corresponds to Intel's 2-core CPU models. As a result, in this niche niche the dominant position is the company "AMD". The approximate configuration of such a PC is shown in the table below. The parameters of this computer will be enough to play video, listen to music, work in office applications and even some toys on it will go at minimal settings.

Estimated complete set of multimedia station

Office computers

In this comparison between AMD FX vs Intel will be on the side of the latter. It has very productive entry-level CPUs of a very democratic value. The most optimal in the framework of such a computing system will look like a Celeron chip . The approximate configuration of such a computer is given in the following table.

Office computer 2016

Entry-level PCs

Theoretically, within the entry-level gaming PC, you can still compare, for example, AMD FX-6300 vs Intel "Kor Ai 3". But the difference in speed in this case will be just fantastic. And the second CPU will win, which has only 2 real modules for computing, instead of having 6 paired blocks. Therefore, in any case, the gaming system should be based on Intel chips. They are more expensive, but they have much better performance. Well, for gaming systems, the number of pictures displayed per second is the first, and here the difference between AMD FX vs Intel i3 will be simply stunning. The approximate configuration of such a computer is shown in the table below.

Complete basic game system

Medium-sized gaming systems

Comparing the AMD FX-8350 vs Intel "Kor Ai 5" in the framework of even the mid-level gaming PC by the number of frames output per second, we will get a significant difference. In some cases, the difference will be 20-30 frames per second. In dynamic games, this is unacceptable. Therefore, it is most correct to assemble a mid-level gaming system only on a high-grade 4-core CPU from Intel. 6600 . And the best thing to look towards the chip is the i5-6600 . он позволит получить отменный «Геймплей». It is in combination with the GeForce 1060 that it will allow you to get an excellent "Gameplay". It should be noted that the video card must necessarily be equipped with 6 GB of RAM. Also, to install processors with an unlocked multiplier in such a system is not entirely justified. They are aimed at the premium segment and work in tandem with a more expensive and efficient graphics card. In other respects, the approximate equipment is given in the table below.

Mid level gaming system

Uncompromising gaming computers

If already with the comparison of Intel Core i5 vs AMD an undeniable advantage is already on the side of the first company, in this case there are essentially no analogs for the second company. каких-либо шансов продукции первой компании не дает. The premium segment of the CPU for the last 5 years is confidently occupied by the products of only one company - Intel, and even the comparison of AMD FX-9590 vs Intel LGA 2011-v3 does not give any chance of production of the first company. для сокета LGA2011-v3. As noted earlier, the Core i7 processors for the LGA2011-v3 socket are aimed at this niche . ни могут включать до 10 вычислительных блоков, имеют увеличенный объем кеш-памяти и разблокированный множитель. Neither can include up to 10 computational units, have an increased cache size and an unlocked multiplier.

But the key difference in this case is the RAM controller, which can function in 4-channel mode. As a result, the RAM subsystem is faster in this case, and so far there is no decent competition for such computers.

PC for computer enthusiast

Graphic stations

Within this specialized niche, the comparison between AMD FX vs Intel Core i5 indicates that the products of the first company are obsolete and lose in all respects. The base chip for this PC is i5-6400.

An approximate configuration of the same system is given in the following table.

Complete the graphic station

And what's next?

The next few months will be very saturated in the processor market. First in January, Intel will update the model range of its chips and will present the 7th generation of its architecture, codenamed Core. Cardinal changes in this case is not expected. We will work on the bugs, slightly improved performance and added some new technologies. Then, already closer to the end of the first quarter, AMD will finally release its new socket, which will be called AM4. In this case, the changes will already be revolutionary. Chips will be produced by a new technical process, have an improved architecture and will receive new technologies. It is these "Zen" processors that will in theory need to restore parity in the CPU market. Only after that, it will be expedient to revise the previously presented computer configurations.

Results

Let's sum up the results of the comparison of Intel vs AMD processor products within this material. The only niche where the positions of the second company are still strong are multimedia systems and PCs for budgetary and office purposes. And in the second case, Intel's products look even more preferable. Another advantage that AMD boasts is the lower cost of its products. даже по нынешним меркам. But is it worth saving the same $ 100 and getting an outdated system even by today's standards. AMD FX vs Intel Core именно на продукцию второй компании. This is obvious: the PC is bought for 3-5 years, so in all other cases when buying a new computer system, it's more correct to navigate when comparing AMD FX vs Intel Core to the products of the second company.