Compare antivirus: select the most reliable. Comparison of corporate antiviruses

Today under consideration is a comparison of antiviruses. Modern anti-virus programs give us quite a lot of guarantees and opportunities. But often you can see how some say that their antivirus is better, and the one that stands, say, in the office of "Uncle Petit from the 5th entrance" is worse several times. Therefore, we will try to compare antivirus. The table of possible software options can be quite voluminous, so let's see what users say after using the most popular means of protecting your computer from malicious programs.

What do antiviruses do?

But first let's try to understand with you what the antivirus can protect and cure the operating system. Of course, as already mentioned, from malicious files. But what is dangerous about them? What are they like? Let's see. This is important for our comparison, because some antiviruses do better with the search for one type of computer infection, while others successfully fight other pests in the system.

So, the first kind of "infection" is the Trojans. They are able to steal user data, as well as damage the operating system. They are considered the most dangerous and "quirky".

Worms are the second virus that you may encounter. It was common for 10 years ago. It does not carry any particular danger to the system, except that it clogs it with its data, which slows down the computer. Effectiveness in the fight against worms is a weighty factor when comparing antiviruses for "Android." After all, if such a system starts to "stall," you can forget about the comfortable work of a smartphone or tablet.

Spam is the third type of computer infection that every user can encounter. Such programs are quite diverse in their actions. They can either simply display advertising banners, or steal data. It is worth considering spam in the "neglected" state (when the computer is very slow) by a very dangerous type of virus, the same as the Trojans.

A difficult choice

If you compare the antiviruses of corporate, then, most likely, there will be no special problems. After all, it is customary for these purposes to buy some famous brands and even pay large sums of money for them.

But the situation is slightly different if you are the most ordinary average user. Agree, no one wants to pay several thousand rubles for a program that does not give you guarantees that it will work fine and protect your computer. If everything was as promised, then the viruses would cease to create. It's unprofitable to try and infect a computer that has an antivirus with 100 percent protection of data.

Unfortunately, as already mentioned, no paid antivirus program gives a guarantee that it will fully cope with the task set before it - not to miss the computer infection in the operating system. That's when the first important question arises before the user: which antivirus to choose - paid or free? If you buy, which one? In order to help people choose, we will compare the effectiveness of antivirus software. Let's start studying the topic as soon as possible.

Search for worms

So, the first thing to do is look at the indicator, such as finding and treating worms. As you can see, for a computer this type of computer infection is not particularly dangerous. Rather unpleasant. At the same time, it is necessary to heal the system from such viruses.

Let's try to compare the antiviruses Spy Hunter, Kaspersky, Dr.Web and Nod32. These are quite popular and common means of device protection. So what about the search for worms?

The incomparable leader here is a free utility, created specifically for "catching" a particularly "cunning" computer infection, - Spy Hunter. For her, the search for worms is quite common. Kaspersky® is doing a little worse with this task. Nevertheless, it is often used as a corporate antivirus. After all, in offices, as a rule, the probability of securing some dangerous virus is quite small. A little better with the search for worms cope Nod32. As many users note, on an equal footing with Spy Hunter copes with these pests of Dr.Web. In principle, if you count on the integrity of the firm's employees (more precisely, they will only visit "work sites"), then you can choose any of them.

Trojans

Well, now let's compare antiviruses on a more important indicator. Probably, every user ever encountered such a "thing" as a Trojan horse. A very unpleasant virus that is dangerous for the operating system. Now let's see what our users say about our security software options.

Spy Hunter is not very good at finding data for pests. In general, this free antivirus is created only for a personal computer, and mainly for the purpose of detecting worms and spyware. Do not expect that he will be able to detect the Trojans on "excellent". Only if the database is updated continuously is it possible to successfully cope with this task.

"Kaspersky", too, perhaps, is now coping with this task is not as good as we would like. This is a good antivirus (both software for individuals and corporate versions), but only until you come across something very dangerous and "tricky". True, we are talking about versions for PC. For "Android" "Casper" is quite enough. Nod32 with "Trojan horses" fights the same as Spy Hunter.

A born leader here is Dr. Web. Users are satisfied with the work of this antivirus in the search and treatment of the system from Trojans.

Spam

Now let's compare antiviruses for the quality of the operating system recovery from a variety of spam. Because now every second computer is infected with this particular computer infection. Sometimes catching and removing advertising banners and browser hijackers is too difficult.

Leading in the fight against spam Spy Hunter, because this antivirus is designed specifically to combat spyware, as well as advertising. On the second place - Nod32. It is not so good when fighting advertising. After all, sometimes this antivirus tends to erase pretty important files that could be cured. However, even worse with this task is coping "Kaspersky". Sometimes he is able to accept an absolutely normal link for advertising. Concerning Dr.Web, you can only say that it also copes very well with the search and removal of spam. If you decide to choose an antivirus that is designed specifically for this purpose, then stop at "Hunter" or "Doctor" (including for "Android").

Spyware

Then you can stop at such an important point as the detection of spyware. These are the applications that can steal your personal information quickly enough. Sometimes the comparison of the effectiveness of antiviruses starts from this point, because this topic becomes more relevant every day.

Among our today's antiviruses, Spy Hunter is an unsurpassed leader. This program is just perfect for finding spyware, and also for cleaning the system from this infection. The Nod32 and Dr.Web cope with this problem. In principle, this is quite logical: some antiviruses are designed to fight mainly with Trojans and dangerous viruses, and some - for the discovery and treatment of everything else.

Worst of all, according to users, copes with this task, "Kaspersky". So if you decide to choose a good antivirus (anyway, corporate or not) that perfectly fights with spyware, then it's better to stop at Nod32 or Dr.Web. For personal (home) use it is desirable to supplement the anti-virus protection with the Spy Hunter utility.

Conflict and inaccuracy

Well, the comparison of antiviruses has almost come to an end. However, there are still a couple of moments, which should pay special attention when choosing a corporate version of "antivirus". It's about compatibility with hardware, other software and, of course, about giving false signals.

The most "loyal" is Spy Hunter. He least of all conflicts with programs and applications, and also least "swears" at them. In addition, stamping out false messages about the presence of a virus in an absolutely "healthy" file is not his fad. All this can not be said about Kaspersky. Users note that it very often conflicts with applications, blocks utilities, and also accepts "healthy" files for infected ones. This is not dangerous even if the system files are not suspected under suspicion.

Nod32 is less in conflict, and also much better with software. Even better "works" Dr.Web. Probably, if you choose a corporate antivirus, as well as a means to protect software based on "Android", taking into account the conflict and reliability, then it is best to stop on the "Doctor".

Let's sum up the results

If you look at the table below, you can see how users relate to the anti-virus programs we used for comparison. Their effectiveness was assessed by several rather important criteria. This table will help determine which software version and for what type of viruses it is best to use.

In conclusion, we note: the decision on which type of antivirus to choose, will remain just for you. It's best to dwell on paid versions, and then supplement them with free utilities. So you can maximally secure your data.