Junta - what is it, what are the features of this regime?

Often people in everyday life or in the media hear the word "Junta". What it is? What does this concept mean? Let's try to understand. This term is associated with Latin America. It is a question of such a concept as the "junta" regime. In translation, the word means "combined" or "associated". The power of the junta is a kind of authoritarian political regime, a military bureaucratic dictatorship established as a result of a military coup and carrying out the government in a dictatorial way, and also with the help of terror. In order to understand the essence of this regime, one must first understand what a military form of dictatorship is.

Military dictatorship

Military dictatorship is a form of government in which the military enjoys an almost absolute power . They, as a rule, overthrow the current government through a coup d'état. This form is similar, but not identical to stratocracy. The last country is ruled directly by military officials. Like every type of dictatorship, this form can be both official and unofficial. Many dictators, like Manuel Noriega in Panama, had to obey the civil government, but this is only nominal. Despite the structure of the regime based on force methods, it is still not quite a stratocracy. Any screen did exist. There are also mixed types of dictatorial government, in which military officials exert a very serious influence on power, but they do not control the situation alone. Typical military dictatorships in Latin America, as a rule, were precisely the junta.

Junta - what is it?

Distribution this term has received thanks to military regimes in the Latin American countries. In Soviet political science, the junta meant the power of reactionary military groups in a number of capitalist states that established the regime of a military dictatorship of fascist or close to fascism. The junta was a committee that consisted of a number of officers. And it was not always the highest command. This is evidenced by the winged Latin American expression "the power of the colonels".

Soviet interpretation

In the post-Soviet space, the concept under consideration received a clearly negative connotation, and is also used for propaganda purposes to create a negative image of the government of a particular state. In a figurative sense, the concept of "junta" also applies to governments of kleptocratic countries with the highest level of corruption. In everyday colloquial speech, this term can be used even in relation to a group of persons who take some action by mutual agreement. However, their goals are dishonorable or even criminal.

Junta: what is this in terms of the political system?

The military junta was one of the most massive types of authoritarian regimes that arose during the period when freedom was granted to a number of Latin American and other states against colonial dependence. After the creation of national states in traditional societies, the military proved to be the most cohesive and organized stratum of society. They were able to lead the masses, based on the ideas of national self-determination. After approval in power, the policy of the military elite in different countries received a different orientation: in some states, it led to the removal of corrupt comprador elites from the posts and generally benefited from the formation of a national state (Indonesia, Taiwan). In other cases, the military elite itself became an instrument for realizing the influence of serious centers of power. The story goes that most of the military dictatorships in Latin America were funded by the United States. The US's advantage was that in a certain country there would not be a communist regime, as long as the junta rules. What is it, we hope, has become clear.

The fate of the majority of the junta

The fact is that many believe that democracy in many countries began precisely with the regime of the "junta". What does this mean? After the Second World War died down, most of the military dictatorships, which took control of a number of countries under their control, had only a transitional character. The power of the junta gradually evolved from an authoritarian regime to democracy. Examples are countries such as South Korea, Argentina, Spain, Brazil and others. The reasons for this lie in the following. First, over time, contradictions of an economic and political nature grew within the state. Secondly, the influence of the developed industrial states, which sought to increase the number of democratic countries, was growing. Today, such government regimes as the junta practically do not occur. However, this term has become firmly established throughout the world.