Antinomy is ... Antinomies: examples

"The class of food, for example, is not other food, but classes of things that are not food are one of the things that are not food." Antinomy is precisely the difference between two concepts that exclude one another, phenomena, each of which is separately provable by logic.

Contradiction

The contradiction between the two concepts, with each of them separately in itself, within the framework of a certain scientific theory has the right to exist. But still the antinomy is different from the contradiction. The contradiction arises as a result of truth and error in different arguments. The contradiction can be overcome with the help of logic, different theories. But in order to overcome the antinomy, it is necessary to change the very logic or theory, or both that and that together. Antinomy is, in fact, an incentive for the development of science. There are different strategies for solving logical contradictions such as antinomy. Consider these strategies.

Antinomy

One, for example, says that, in essence, if the theoretical basis of the result is not questioned, and the version of the logical theory of the result is used in the form of an antinomical formula of the type "p and not p" as executable, then the logic of the prohibition of contradiction is not violated. In such a strategy, the meaning of the word antinomy is hidden.

An example of such a strategy is Rogowski's logic, which formalizes the explanation of the mechanical action of the body in such a way that even since ancient times the well-known formula "the body that moves, is simultaneously located and is not located in any place" is one of such formulas that are provable with Conservation of the consistency of some given logical system. The antinomy of movement is not understood as a nominally logical contradiction, which, in turn, uses the logical theory of result in the analysis of statements about motion. At present, logic has developed in the direction that relates to the development of logical systems, where it is permissible to use formulas such as antinomy.

Mismatches

Another strategy is that antinomy is an indicator of the discrepancy between the logicality of theoretical hypotheses that are used immediately in explaining certain phenomena. Antinomies, when two things are simultaneously confirmed by experience, have the right to exist. The election of one such thing for research has the right to exist for reasons of compatibility with other things. For patency of antinomy it is necessary to effect a shift in the balance between experimental things. This is achieved by increasing the number and quality of inspections, by analyzing with the logic of the causes of the emergence of antinomy. But this is far from absolute, because if one refutes one thing, it will not automatically mean the correctness of the other. After all, you can refute the whole system of things, and it is impossible to say which of the things can be refuted. When there are harmful consequences of arguments about the antinomy, then the logic tries to develop a system that blocks these most harmful consequences.

Abstractions and speculation

The third strategy is that the system of abstractions and conjectures is limited in scope, based on the theory in which antinomies arose.

Antinomy - a system that is formulated in the form of postulates and axioms, is revealed in the form of non-trivial methodological work. It is the identified antinomies in theories with unexplained assumptions and abstractions that exist as incentives for the formalization of theories. Research sets out the task of finding out which initial abstractions and assumptions lead to antinomies, to fix them or replace them with those that do not have antinomies. Just antinomy is the theory of sets, in which antinomies or paradoxes are found by means of restrictions. In the end, antinomy (examples of some concepts give this to understand) is not contradictory. Sometimes antinomies are those concepts that have appeared in social theories, and they are perceived as prerequisites for approaching the end of development. According to the theory of radiation, the spectral density increases with increasing frequency. This means that the entire radiation density of the body at different temperatures is infinite. This is impossible according to common sense and accurate measurement.

Mind and psychology

Any presence of pure reason is consistent with dialectical conclusions according to the logic scheme. It is quite different when the mind is applied to the objective synthesis of phenomena. Then the mind, proving its unity, but becoming entangled in contradictions, forcibly renounces cosmology.

Antitika arranges and catches the mind in their networks. At the same time, this did not allow the mind to calm down with certainty, but at the same time it forced him to surrender to skepticism and defend certain statements. Both can be considered the death of normal philosophy, although the former, rather, is the antinomy of reason. Let's look at the thoughts that explain and justify the method by which we explore our subject. Ideas that relate to the integrity of the synthesis of phenomena can be called cosmological concepts - just because of integrity and because they relate to the synthesis of phenomena. Paralogisms of pure reason serve as the basis for dialectical psychology. And the antinomy of pure reason shows the basis of rational cosmology. Not that we perceive them as wealthy, but in order to see them as an idea in their false grandeur.

Science and Philosophy

The antinomy of the language - both science and philosophy - is a joint, tribal element of life. But still they are opposite with this in their aspirations. Science and philosophy are antinomy. But they are just - two directions of action, not the actions themselves. Both in philosophy and in science thought tend to move away from the truth, from the core. The philosopher has, for example, something conventionally dead, and the scientist has a living heart. In other words, often the concepts of one have the quality of the other. No one is engaged in science for themselves, no one can understand the essence only in the family circle. The opposite of science and philosophy is explained by different ways in which they have to go. And at the same time, the reality of one and the other can be far from the tasks they set themselves. Science, for example, on the one hand having rigidity, on the other hand fluid and soft. And philosophy is flexible and flexible, but at the same time rigid in its essence. This is all - the explanation of the antinomy by its nature.