Arguments: nature and man are enemies or friends. Nature in human life

Now the problem of interaction between nature and man seems especially acute. There are many reasons: the impoverishment of resources, the growing aggressiveness of the human tribe in relation to mother earth. Accelerating technological progress, which requires more human and natural victims. But we will slow down before enumerating any arguments. "Nature and man" - a topic that requires a certain excursion into history.

The ancient Greeks and their relationship to nature and the world

The ancient Greeks did not separate themselves from nature and the world. Man and the world formed an indissoluble unity. The man at that time did not suspect that he had a "personality" and an "individuality". True, many people do not know anything about this and call, for example, Socrates an individualist. Yes, the famous Greek, one might say, was the ancestor of individualism, but he himself was not an individualist. He resignedly accepted his fate and drank the poison of the cicuta - where is individualism?

The same is confirmed by the relationship between man and nature. Arguments are as follows: each element has its own god. It is very important that all the gods (elements) live in peace. The ancient Greeks were very reverent when it came to matters of nature. They believed that the whole world is subordinated to the principles of universal harmony, so nothing should break the habitual state of things, everything is as it should be. Nature and man are one. If they were told: "Give arguments: nature and man are interrelated?" - they would not understand the question. For them, everything was obvious.

Attitude to nature in the Middle Ages

When only monuments remained from Antiquity, and the Greek gods turned into demons of the Christian world, the relationship between man and nature, arguments in an eternal dispute, also changed. Now nature was part of the sinful material world, but, to be sure, it never occurred to a man to destroy or tear it apart. Nature and the world were perceived by man as something that must be overcome for the sake of spiritual union with God.

God, nature, man - triune union in the Renaissance

After the ascetic torment of man in the Middle Ages in the Renaissance, everything that relates to the body and the material world is deified. What is famous about the Renaissance, in addition to the "Hammer of Witches," the excesses of the Inquisition, and all the rich people emerging from the banks of sensual pleasures? Correctly. Pantheism is a doctrine according to which God is dissolved in nature, and the world has soul and mind. To know God is possible only through nature. It is its concrete embodiment.

As it is not difficult to understand, in this time the attitude of man to nature, the arguments for or against it are completely different than in the Middle Ages. In the Renaissance, the surrounding world is absolutely wonderful, because people love everything material, they worship nature - the personification of God.

New Time. F. Bacon's aphorism: "Knowledge is power". The beginning of the conquest of nature by man

New time is marked by the fact that a person wants to subordinate the whole world and himself to science and reason. In this period, the problem of nature and man is born, arguments, however, are not yet being sought. Nature is perceived as a passive object, intended only for human research and experiments on it.

Do not strictly judge the leaders of modern times. They did not expect that the mind in our day will turn against itself and give birth to an technotronic monster - our modern civilization. If such a comparison is allowed, then this is analogous to how parents love and admire their golden-haired child, not knowing that he will grow up as a murderer.

Until modern times, the mind could not actually reveal itself completely, because there was no experimental science. It also originated with the accomplishments of F. Bacon, B. Spinoza and R. Descartes, that's why people tried reason, but also themselves. For example, F. Bacon died of having caught a cold when he was conducting another experiment. Fantastic energy was a man. Could he have supposed that someday there would be a problem of nature and man, would they even need arguments? Yes, never.

But there was also one who appealed even then to think better and return to nature. Jean-Jacques Rousseau became such a man, but his cry was a voice crying in the desert.

The current stage in the development of the relationship between nature and man

Now we do not need to ask questions and look for arguments: "Nature and man are interrelated?" Today for us, as for the ancient Greeks at one time, everything is obvious. But, unfortunately, in the opposite direction. Many today would like to join in and pick up the cry of Zh.-Z. Rousseau, but it's too late. Why? Because nature in human life, arguments for it can not change anything in a global sense. Factories and factories pump out all the juices from the ground in pursuit of profit.

The relationship between nature and society

And meanwhile now society is dependent on nature, and nature is dependent on society. Natural cataclysms have tangible social consequences. And technological catastrophes painfully respond to mother nature. Therefore, a person must protect himself and the world around him. Unfortunately, most people do not think strategically: for them, nature is in human life, the arguments in its favor are reduced to a beautiful summer day or barbecue in the air. And so they are ready to live under the dome, which replaces the atmosphere in fantasy novels. Amazing? If this were not so, then people would have protected their environment, and would not have treated it devil-may-carely.

Closing the topic "Arguments: nature and man", I must say that it would be easiest for the planet to shake people off of themselves, but apparently the human race needs Earth for some reason.